Thomas Fey

Date: 22.10.2025 (2025-10-22)


Thomas Fey (22.10.2025) • https://www.linkedin.com/in/thomas-fey-831764164/ • Technology Strategy & Enterprise Architecture at Accenture • Ich arbeite aktuell an einer Plattform für Geschäftsprozessautomatisierung - im Prinzip ähnlich wie UiPath oder n8n - allerdings mit einem neuen Ansatz, der Legacy-Systeme ohne API automatisch integrieren kann.
Ich würde super gerne dein Feedback dazu bekommen, insbesondere aus deiner Perspektive aus deinem bei Accenture.

Context: • What are your main tasks? • • Which tools are they using? Inhouse? •

His Experience & Current Practices • Legacy systems: does he deal with them (accounting tools, banking interfaces, HRIS, ERP)? How painful are integrations? • Every company wants to have agents -> but companies are not able to develop their own • Legacy software: • Current project: most systems have APIs - bank project • He does not have a legacy software in mind -> often there are integration layers -> often legacy systems are not the bottleneck • Bottleneck: • Figure out the setup of technical infrastructure which is often complex -> especially for non-standard information • Solution: they define requirements for the people that provide APIs -> these teams solve it directly or they forward the requirements to external companies - they develop a feature request -> depends when it comes on roadmap • Projects: • A lot is around AI implementation -> the whole life cycle - different stages of companies: • Data Ebene, governance • First POCs: GenAI or other AI models • Agents: slowly starts now - first projects (R&D divisions drive the development) • A lot of strategy projects: legislation, audit, compliance • It seems to be very early -> he has one project in mind where agents were actually deployed; UBS but not at scale • Smaller projects: process optimisation for departments or parts of a company
• Tax credit and advisory • UBS: Accenture develops the agents themselves -> they are part of the UBS team -> mix of client and Accenture teams • Corporate: budgets are done top down -> every MD gets budget for internal and external projects -> important in cost calculation -> external is not a fix cost • Hypothesis: general tools like n8n are too complex to set up for many processes -> important to specialise? • In a family office RPA delivers a lot of value -> maintenance costs are high (bus factor is also real) • His take: starre Lösungen - oft nutzen es die Leute nicht richtig -> Schattenprozesse -> is a problem (technical debt) • Big value add: templates that cover the biggest use cases • Top 10 use cases in finance -> fast ROI is possible • For them as consultants it is good to have a defined solution -> ROI is important • Day-to-day reality: What are the most admin-heavy processes in his finance role (invoices, reconciliations, reporting, payroll, compliance, audits)? • • Is he automating today? If yes, which tools (Excel macros, Zapier, RPA, ERP features)? • If yes: who does it? Which tools? What works? What does not work? • • If no, why not (cost, complexity, lack of time, no clear ROI)? • • More processes to automate: • • Other automations from other people / departments: • • Successes & frustrations: if he had a “magic wand,” what would he automate first? • • Ask if he can introduce you to 3 peers in similar roles (finance leads in other startups). • Other: •